February 05, 2008
EBPs. Let's get right to the point. It stands for Evidence-Based Practices. What it means is "best we know how." Not "sure hope that works" – and definitely not "that's the way we've always done it."
The acronym may seem to be suddenly on everyone's lips, but the reality behind it is well-grounded and widely accepted.
"EBPs are no more of a fad than science," says Dennis McBride, Survey Director of the Washington Institute for Mental Health Research and Training – Western Branch (WIMHRT West). In 2007, McBride conducted a survey of providers on their use of EBPs. The results were published in the report Mental Health Evidence Based Practices (EBPs) in Washington State and presented in a PowerPoint presentation at the Transformation Work Group (TWG) meeting on January 4, 2008.
"In social, behavioral, and health programs, there has always been an interest to better understand and apply interventions," McBride says. "Questions commonly asked are what works, for whom, under what circumstances? To answer these questions programs have increasingly turned to sound scientific research principles."
It's not easy. Like anything with a solid scientific grounding, the process can be painstaking and arduous.
"What makes something evidence-based in the research literature is that a very specific clinical protocol was followed with a defined, specific population, whatever it might be," says Ron Jemelka of the Mental Health Transformation Project. "Based on that protocol, administered to a defined population, outcomes must be demonstrated scientifically and through empirical research to accrue consistently. When a given practice has been demonstrated to consistently produce good outcomes, across a number of well-designed studies, it starts being talked about as an evidence-based practice. A small number of studies, vaguely described, and with small samples, may lead to a particular treatment being considered 'promising' or 'emerging ', but doesn't elevate it to 'evidence-based' status."
In short, for a practice to become considered an EBP, it has to produce favorable outcomes, it has to produce them repeatedly, and it has to do so no matter who uses it.
There is still much room for disagreement about the effectiveness of an EBP even after it has been generally accepted. Verification ultimately needs to take many variables into account. It's also critically important that an EBP is administered properly (this consideration is known as fidelity). Most importantly, an EBP has to actually improve outcomes.
Here are examples of some of the most commonly accepted and widely used EBPs now:
McBride identified a number of useful points from the survey that apply to the Washington State Department of Social and Health Services (DSHS):
McBride says results from this survey will also be used as a baseline moving forward, but points out that surveys may not be the best tool for monitoring use of EBPs.
"More sustainable mechanisms need to be in place," he says. "For example, in-house monitoring tied to annual reporting. Programs need to be given financial support and training for this purpose."
Did you find this article of interest? Do you have a comment you'd like to make? If you'd like to comment on this article, click on the "Send A Comment" button above.